Jury Trials

United States v. an Individual, (S. D. Cal. 2009):  Extremely large and complex Department of Justice prosecution of multiple defendants charged with conspiring to use the internet to unlawfully distribute prescription drugs and launder money.  The trial, which involved seven codefendants and lasted more than three months, resulted in a hung jury and a mistrial.  Before the retrial, client accepted the government's offer of a plea to a misdemeanor offense with no jail time, no fine, and no criminal forfeiture.

United States v. an Individual, (C. D. Cal. 2008):  Client acquitted by jury of all six felony counts in complex murder trial involving alleged prison gang. Acquitted charges included First Degree Murder, Conspiracy to Commit Murder, and Assault with Intent to Commit Murder.

United States v. an Individual, (S. D. Cal. 2007):  Narcotics importation case (single occupant driver of vehicle containing 16.54 kilograms of marijuana) dismissed after jury trial resulting in hung jury.

United States v. an Individual, (S. D. Cal. 2007):  Narcotics importation case (single occupant driver who allegedly confessed to knowingly importing 14.48 kilograms of methamphetamine) dismissed after two jury trials resulting in hung juries.

United States v. an Individual, (S. D. Cal. 2006):  Alien smuggling case (single occupant driver of vehicle containing concealed undocumented alien) resulting in complete acquittal after jury trial.

Back to top

Appeals

Garcia-Aguilar v. United States District Court for the S. Dist. of California, 535 F.3d 1021 (9th Cir. 2008): Successfully argued to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that the district court could not refuse to accept the defendant’s guilty plea even though, due to omissions in the charging document, the defendant would face a statutory maximum of “only” two years’ imprisonment, rather than twenty.  Client sentenced to probation on remand.

United States v. an Individual, (9th Cir. 2007): Successfully argued to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that the deportation underlying an illegal re-entry conviction was defective.  Conviction vacated and indictment dismissed.

United States v. an Individual, (9th Cir. 2007): Successfully argued to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that the district court erred in calculating the defendant’s sentencing guidelines.  Client sentenced to time-served on remand.

United States v. an Individual, (9th Cir. 2007): Successfully argued to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that the district court erred in imposing a five-year mandatory-minimum sentence.  Client sentenced to time-served on remand.

Back to top

Pre-Trial Motions, Dismissals and Settlements

United States v. an Individual, (S. D. Cal. 2008):  Narcotics importation case (pedestrian who confessed to importing 1.86 kilograms of marijuana, which was taped to his thighs) resulting in a  plea to a misdemeanor.

United States v. an Individual, (S. D. Cal. 2007):  Narcotics importation case (front-seat passenger and registered owner of a vehicle containing 29.88 kilograms of cocaine) dismissed before trial.

United States v. an Individual (S. Dist. Cal. 2006): Narcotics importation and passport fraud case (single occupant driver of vehicle containing 7.98 kilograms of methamphetamine) dismissed before trial.

United States v. an Individual (S. Dist. Cal. 2005):  Successfully argued to federal district court that evidence of twelve undocumented aliens in a motor home should be suppressed because of an illegal stop and search.  All charges dismissed. 

Back to top

 

 

 
  Jury Trials

Appeals

Pre-Trial Motions, Dismissals and Settlements

 

 
   
   
       


Disclaimer